A first-rate demonstration of a non-grammatical content in a structure
This tabulation of the signgroups, which marks 30 pair of signgroups; Each pair (components) tied together by an identical sign (marked blue). The two components of the pair have moreover each one offshoot (red letters) to the 'next-floor' pairs, which possess exactly the same qualities (one sign in common, each component with an offshoot to the next pair). In this way all 61 signgroups are linked together by one single string. Moreover, no signgroup needs to be laterally reversed to fulfil this orderly system, except for B04, which already seems reversed.
The most frequent elements are ’BA’ with thirteen occurrences, and 'the thorns' with seventeen. Those two are isolated from the above countings. This chaining together make use of as much as 30 out of a total of 46 dissimilar signs (2/3) as links.
If all the words in a piece of poetry or a prosaic text, chosen by random, could be linked together in one unbroken chain by double stitch! Same as could those clusters of pictographs; Would’nt we then expect, that unknown disciplines inside philology had developed during time? For instance *metaphorical translations of texts into unambiguous patterns, like the harmony of the spheres, or like Mandelbrot music? This is not the case in texts, otherwise opponents of my discovery would long have dished up with competitive examples from Literature, but they stay mute, whereas in systems alias protokols, ledgers, book-keeping by double entrance, various tables, such symmetri like ’a hollow pyramide’ or 'a gnomonical arrangement' is given by itself. Thereby this classical break-through is in reality settled. Follow-up-questions like, what is the origin of the subject? How
old? An interwoven text simultaneously? Or is it a fake? Etc. - you name it -
are of course secondary questions.